Government orders Ministry of Defence officials to prepare for war | Politics | News


Ministry of Defence officials have been told to prepare the nation for war โ€œin our own backyardโ€. Staff responsible for spending the nation’s ยฃ288 billion defence procurement budget were told to speed up the process and equip the armed forces โ€œto be ready to fightโ€, even if it meant taking more risks with public money. The instruction came from Defence Minister Luke Pollard, who was appointed in September as the minister responsible for procurement. He said: โ€œWe are not at war, but nor are we at peace any longer.โ€

It follows warnings from other defence experts that the UK is effectively at war with Russia already. Last week George Robertson, the former General Secretary of NATO who previously served as Defence Secretary, said: โ€œRussia is clearly at war with us. Iโ€™ve no doubt at all that even though weโ€™re not at war with them, theyโ€™ve clearly declared war on us.โ€ Russian President Vladimir Putinโ€™s regime was using organised criminals to conduct sabotage operations in western Europe, he said.

The Kremlin has also sent drones into Polish airspace and jets into Estonia to test the Westโ€™s defences.

The Ministry of Defence has allocated ยฃ288.6 billion for equipment and support over ten years from 2023 to 2033, and Mr Pollard told defence industry insiders the Government wants to cut the time required to buy new equipment by more than half. He said: โ€œProcurements that take five years need to take two years. Those that take two, need to take one.โ€

The Minister warned: โ€œWe need to be ready for war fighting in a way that we have not done for many years, not expeditionary war fighting, but securing our own backyard.”

He said the Ministry of Defence was changing its โ€œrisk ratiosโ€, adding: โ€œPeacetime procurement was fine when we were in a peacetime, but you all know that we are not at war, but nor are we at peace any longer.

โ€œSo our procurement system needs to adapt, and that means we need a different approach to how we look at risk, and a cultural shift about how we do that, and that means shifting our focus to readiness and growth, to war-fighting readiness.โ€

The change doesn’t affect the quality of the equipment used by the armed forces, but is intended to speed up the process of obtaining it.

And Mr Pollard said the role of procurement is “equipping our people to be able to be ready to fight.”

Foreign policy experts said the UK must be ready to defend itself. Alan Mendoza, Executive Director of the Henry Jackson Society, said: โ€œThe time for talk on this matter is over. If Ministers truly believe Britain is โ€˜not at peaceโ€™ then they must act like it. With ever-increasing threats and new forms of warfare emerging, the Government needs to set out a clear plan and a firm commitment for how our armed forces will be ready should conflict come. Speeches donโ€™t deter adversaries – credible capability does.โ€

But an insider at the Minister of Defenceโ€™s Defence Equipment and Support agency based in Bristol, which oversees procurement, said the Ministerโ€™s comments had caused confusion. They said: โ€œAs no one is quite sure what the Minister means by taking risks with contracts, many of us are now hesitating about what is required.

โ€œMost of my colleagues want him to clarify exactly what type of risks are acceptable and those not to avoid costly mistakes for the taxpayer.โ€

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.