Rachel Reeves must do one thing to protect state pension from tax | Politics | News
Rachel Reeves should reintroduce an age-related personal allowance for older people to protect the state pension from tax, a campaigner has suggested.
Dennis Reed, the director of Silver Voices, accused the Chancellor of getting into a โright royal pickleโ over her extension of a freeze on the lower tax threshold.
This policy means that from 2027, older people on the new state pension could find themselves paying tax on this, as it will exceed the frozen personal allowance of ยฃ12,570.
In the following years, Mr Reed warned the majority of pensioners would be sucked into the tax system and start paying tax on their triple lock increases.
He said: โI am pleased that the Chancellor has recognised the injustice of the basic state pension being taxed, but her solution is unfair and unworkable. She has got herself into a right royal pickle of her own making by refusing to discuss possible solutions with Silver Voices.
โThe only way the state pension and triple lock increases can be protected from tax in the future is to reintroduce an age -related personal allowance for pensioners and uprate it each year in line with rises in the state pensionโ.
Silver Voices has been campaigning to expose the injustice of the basic pension being taxed after it had been paid for throughout working lives in National Insurance and tax contributions.
Public support for the campaign forced the Government to include in the Budget Red Book a policy that pensioners whose sole income is the state pension will not have to pay โsmall amounts of taxโ if their income exceeds the personal allowance after that date.
Shortly after last weekโs Budget, the Chancellor went further in a response to financial journalist Martin Lewis and confirmed later to the BBC, โthat those only taking home the new state pension, will not have to pay tax in this Parliamentโ.
Silver Voices said: โIt would clearly be unfair to exempt those on the new state pension from tax but not those on the old state pension who have additional earnings-related or other state pension entitlements which bring them up to the same level. Why should a pensioner with a small private pension which brings them to the same level of income as someone on the new state pension still have to pay tax?โ
A Treasury spokesman said: โAs the Chancellor has said, over this Parliament those whose only income is the basic or new State Pension without any increments will not have to pay income tax.โ