POLL: Should youngsters on benefits be required to take part in form of national service? | Politics | News
The former logistics officer said he was not calling for conscription, but instead for options to serve in the Armed Forces as part of a national service programme. He said it could help the country realise โthe reality of the nature of the world weโre living inโ after a warning from ex-NATO chief Lord George Robertson that Britain is unprepared for war due to the โever-expanding welfare budgetโ. So what do you think? Should young people on benefits be required to take part in some form of national service? Vote in our poll and join the debate in the comments section.
Speaking to Times Radio, Mr Cross said: โI understand there are something like 800,000 youngsters between the ages of about 18 and 25 who are not in work, not in training, not in education.
โWe are short of soldiers, sailors and airmen. What are we doing paying these youngsters welfare money when we could be saying to them: โYouโre going to join the militaryโ?โ
He admitted the military would struggle to welcome a significant number of young people on national service, but said: โWe can do something and we can begin that process.โ
Latest official figures show between October and December 2025, there were 957,000 people aged 16 to 24 in the UK who were not in employment, education or training.
The Government has insisted it has no plans for military service or conscription, with its focus on developing the professional Armed Forces.
Britainโs military has gradually declined after decades of repeated cuts.
The Army is at its smallest size since the Napoleonic era.
Funding talks between the Ministry of Defence, Treasury and Downing Street have been described as being at a โdeadlockโ.
Britain has not had national service since 1960.
