Government needs to act on Middle East impact on retail, industry warns


Retailers braced for the effects of the Middle East conflict have urged the Government to cut domestic costs to help them keep prices down for consumers.

The British Retail Consortium (BRC) said four in five people (80%) feared the Middle East conflict would push up food prices, and called on the Government to help by easing pressure on businesses from higher national insurance, packaging levies, new regulations, and business energy charges.

The BRC said retailers were already absorbing โ€œsignificantโ€ additional costs from the conflict including rising energy and shipping costs, with knock-on effects for fertiliser, manufacturing and logistics.

It warned those costs would inevitably filter through to the till over the coming months.

But it said the Middle East was only part of the picture, and retailers had absorbed ยฃ6.5 billion in extra employment costs from rising national insurance contributions and the national living wage, alongside a new packaging tax costing ยฃ1.6 billion.

Meanwhile, more regulatory โ€œburdensโ€ were imminent, including guaranteed hours provisions under the Employment Rights Act and the proposed reformulation of thousands of food lines under the new nutrient profiling model.

A survey for the BRC found 73% of people expect the Middle East conflict to raise the price of products other than food, while 81% are worried about rising energy bills, 76% about petrol and diesel, and 68% about tax increases.

Food retailers met Chancellor Rachel Reeves in early April and called for the removal of energy policy levies, network charges and system fees that now make up between 57% and 65% of a typical business electricity bill.

They also asked for the introduction of the updated nutrient profiling model for food and drink to be delayed, and for a review of the triple packaging levy, forecast to cost retailers more than ยฃ2 billion a year.

BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: โ€œThe Middle East conflict is driving up costs across the supply chain and families are right to be concerned.

โ€œBut not every pressure bearing down on retailers comes from the Gulf. Higher national insurance, packaging levies, new regulations, and business energy charges are all domestic policy decisions, made in Westminster, and they can be addressed there.

โ€œSuch action by government would help retailers to keep prices affordable for households.

โ€œOther governments are already acting. Germany has reduced electricity costs for businesses by moving levies off bills and EU leaders are actively discussing similar responses to this crisis.

โ€œThe UK should be moving in the same direction, not treating global instability as cover for inaction on costs of its own making.

โ€œRetailers are working hard to hold prices down, but they cannot do it alone.

โ€œEvery cost government chooses not to address is a cost that will find its way into someoneโ€™s shopping basket. That is a political choice, and it is one ministers still have time to change โ€“ but the window to act is closing.โ€

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.