Getty pulls £2.8bn tie-up with Shutterstock after CMA orders disposal
Getty Images has scrapped its 3.7 billion US dollar (£2.8 billion) merger with rival Shutterstock after Britain’s competition watchdog ruled it must offload part of the business in order to give the deal the green light.
The two companies had agreed a tie-up in January to bring together two of the biggest players in images and video.
But the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) raised concerns over the dominance of the combined business, which it said could lead to higher prices, worse commercial terms and a lower quality of editorial and stock imagery.
It said in May it would give the deal its approval, but only on the condition that Getty sells off Shutterstock’s editorial arm, which provides content for news outlets.
The CMA’s inquiry group found that without the disposal, the combined business would limit UK media outlets’ choices and could increase prices for customers.
Getty said in a regulatory filing late on Tuesday that it was not prepared to sell off the editorial arm of Shutterstock and that it was therefore calling off the merger.
It said: “The UK Competition and Markets Authority conditioned its required clearance of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement upon a sale of Shutterstock’s editorial business.
“Getty Images is not required to accept that condition under the terms of the merger agreement.”
It said the Getty board would keep a financial adviser on to offer advice on “strategic financing alternatives”.
New York-listed Getty saw its shares fall 4% soon after market opening on Wall Street, while Shutterstock’s stock plunged by more than a quarter, down 28%.
During the CMA’s initial probe into the merger, it said it heard “widespread concerns” from businesses, trade associations and other stakeholders across the UK media and creative sectors about the potential impact of the deal.
They included concerns from the News Media Association, whose members publish around 900 media titles in the UK and rely on licensed imagery.
The investigation found concerns over both the editorial content, which produces pictures and videos related to news events, and stock images, where pre-existing images are used under licence for largely commercial purposes.
