The amount of cash we are spending as a country to fund personal independence payments (PIP) as part of welfare is already eye-watering, but the numbers are set to get much bigger. Without proper intervention, they risk becoming unsustainable โ€“ the Prime Minister should be panicking. Despite this, I doubt Andy Burnham will mention Britainโ€™s ballooning welfare bill at his big party conference speech on Tuesday โ€“ after all, he will not want to upset his fragile backbench MPs.

Anyhow, we already know what the PMโ€™s priorities are from the answer he gave to Tory leader Kemi Badenoch in one of his first Prime Ministerโ€™s Questions, Mr Burnham said national security (defence spending) “canโ€™t come at the expense of social securityโ€. Labour is the party of welfare and always will be โ€“ itโ€™s in their DNA, but official figures predict that the PIP benefits bill is set to double by 2030 and we simply cannot afford this.

Britain is skint with economic growth predictions for next year in the doldrums, plus we keep borrowing money that is more expensive to pay back so we must curb our public spending before it contributes to the bankruptcy of the nation.

I am proud of the fact that we live in a country with a welfare state that was originally set-up to support those who fell on hard times and would support them in their hour of need, but over the last decade we seem to have moved on from a mindset of โ€œwhat do I needโ€ to โ€œwhat can I getโ€.

Which brings us onto the worrying forecast of how much PIP will cost by the end of the decade. The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) โ€“ the governmentโ€™s official economic forecaster โ€“ estimates the cost of PIP will nearly double from ยฃ26billion in 2024 to ยฃ45billion in 2030 by which time it will exceed the entire budget of the Department for Transport.

PIP was introduced in 2013 to replace Disability Living Allowance and is designed to help with extra costs if you have a long-term physical or mental health condition or disability and if you have difficulty doing certain daily tasks or getting around because of your condition. The daily living part of PIP is received if you need assistance with preparing food, eating and drinking, washing and bathing, using the loo, getting dressed and undressed, reading, managing your finances, listening and understanding, and socialising around other people.

Access to the mobility part of PIP is based on if you need help with working out a route and following it, leaving your home or physically moving around. Claimants are eligible even if they work, have savings or are getting most other benefits and can receive top rates of ยฃ428 a month based on the standard PIP rate or ยฃ778.40 if they qualify for the enhanced level of support.

Current figures reveal that 4.1 million people are claiming PIP โ€“ this is predicted to rise to five million people by 2031. Nobody would begrudge these payments to anyone who genuinely needs them, but questions must be asked as to why official predictions show the numbers of claimants will rise significantly and consequently cost taxpayers more. As the debate continues about whether the increase in ADHD and autism diagnoses is either down to greater awareness of the symptoms of the condition or excessive misdiagnosis, we are seeing a growing number of young people recorded as having ADHD and autism claim PIP. A report by the Nuffield Trust shows that by April of this year, just over 205,400 people aged 16-24 were receiving the benefit which is more than three times the 2019 figures at an estimated cost of nearly ยฃ1.4billion in 2025/26.

Some readers will rightly question if those with ADHD are truly in need of PIP. Elsewhere, analysis by the TaxPayersโ€™ Alliance campaign group shows that working age PIP claims rose by 467,091 between April 2024 and April 2026 including 37,957 aged between 16 and 19 years old and 87,919 additional claims from people in their 20s. The government has commissioned The Timms Review of Personal Independence Payment having acknowledged that it is no longer fit for purpose, yet its interim report released in July reveals little about any rigorous steps that could be considered to reduce spiralling claiming numbers and the growing cost โ€“ especially among younger people. It is abundantly clear to me that PIP needs to become a means-tested benefit as Britain can no longer afford for it to be otherwise.

The Prime Minister must outline how he plans to address our spiralling welfare bill and the growing cost of PIP โ€“ anything else is just political cowardice.