Uproar at defence minister’s claim about those who fight for Britain | Politics | News
Veterans minister Calvin Bailey has come under fire for saying that voters are who are “traditionally Labour” are the โpeople fightingโ Britainโs wars. A recording surfaced of Mr Bailey boasting at the Labour conference that his party โcreated and established Nato because we tend to have an understanding of the fact that when we go to war, it is a part of the population that is traditionally Labour that is going to be the people fightingโ. He claimed that the โbig defence cuts have come under the Conservativesโ.
Stuart Anderson, the Toriesโ Shadow Minister for War Readiness, who served as a soldier in Northern Ireland, Bosnia and Kosovo, said: โLabour are refusing to find the money to fund our armed forces and spend 3% of GDP on defence by 2030. So the suggestion that military service is something traditionally associated with Labour voters is absurd.
โWhatโs more, Conservative MPs currently serving in Parliament include veterans of the Royal Green Jackets, Royal Navy, Royal Artillery, SAS, Scots Guards, Royal Marines, Royal Yorkshire Regiment and Royal Tank Regiment, among others. And while Labour lectures everyone else about its affinity with the armed forces, its Northern Ireland Legacy Bill is reopening the prospect of veterans facing further investigations and legal proceedings over their service in Northern Ireland. Any suggestion that one political party or its supporters uniquely represents those who serve therefore does not reflect the cross-party nature of Britainโs armed forces community.โ
A spokesperson for Calvin Bailey, who served as a Wing Commander in the Royal Air Force and was on operations in Afghanistan, Haiti, Cyprus, Sudan and Iraq, said: โThese comments have been taken out of context. As someone who served for decades in the RAF, Calvin hugely values all those who have bravely served in our Armed Forces, regardless of their political views.โ