Fury as Ed Miliband eyes plans to dump nuclear waste in the countryside | Politics | News


Ed Miliband could change the law to allow him to dump nuclear waste near countryside communities without their consent. Currently, residents in a โ€˜Potential Host Communityโ€™ are given a vote on whether or not to accept a Geological Disposal Facility near them, after other rounds of consultation and council involvement.

However Mr Milibandโ€™s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) is eyeing scrapping this stage of the consultation process in order to force through new disposal facilities. The GDFs consist of a huge mine-like network of tunnels, which extend under the sea and are used to store the used-up fuel from nuclear power plants. Despite Mr Miliband insisting that new nuclear power stations are โ€œessential for energy security, good jobs, lower bills and climate actionโ€, Britain currently has no permanent site for storing the spent radioactive waste that would result from a more intensive nuclear energy programme.

The Government has been searching for sites to host the required disposal projects, however opposition from both residents and councils has hampered efforts.

East Lindsey, Lincolnshire, South Holderness in East Yorkshire, and Cumbria have all been explored as potential locations.

However both Lincolnshire and East Yorkshire have already pulled out of talks with the body responsible for delivering GDFs.

The Telegraph reports that civil servants at DESNZ are reviewing the โ€˜Test of Public Supportโ€™ policy in light of the โ€˜NIMBYโ€™ resistance.

A departmental source said: โ€œThereโ€™s a review going on of how the whole policy works โ€“ every option is being looked at again.

โ€œThe policy currently says there has to be a vote in each area before anything can go ahead and that local authorities can effectively veto proposals as well.

โ€œNow there are conversations about whether you need to prioritise other things, like which area has the best geology. This is a national infrastructure project and it has to be driven centrally.โ€

A spokesman for the department said: โ€œOur position continues to be that any potential geological disposal facility site will be subject to agreement with the community and wonโ€™t be imposed on an area without local consent.โ€

However the move would fit with the governmentโ€™s wider approach of slashing red tape and reducing the opportunities for community campaigners to reject infrastructure, in the pursuit of building more houses.

The government currently forecasts that such a nuclear waste storage facility would cost anywhere between ยฃ20 billion and a whopping ยฃ53 billion.

Labourโ€™s newly-established infrastructure quango, Nista, recently warned that the schemeโ€™s costs risk spiralling out of control, downgrading its rating from โ€˜amberโ€™ to โ€˜redโ€™.

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.