Online influencer who has found fame by cleaning the homes of vulnerable people will this week force Parliament to confront the horrific abuse suffered by many animals. Bea Elton has secured a debate on creating a โ€œpublic animal abuser registerโ€ with nearly 240,000 signing a petition in support. MPs will debate the proposals on Monday.

Ms Elton is calling for a register which would be โ€œsearchable by vets, breeders, charities and the public to prevent repeat offendingโ€. She also wants an โ€œautomatic, lifetime ban on animal ownership for anyone convicted of animal neglect or abuseโ€.

In an online message, Ms Elton states: โ€œI clean homes for free for people in need and regularly witness animals suffering under owners with a history for animal neglect or abuse. Currently, bans are discretionary and there is no public register. Abusers can continue acquiring animals. A mandatory ban and register could prevent repeat cruelty and break cycles of harm. Additionally, an immediate automatic lifetime ban could prevent animal ownership being at a judgeโ€™s discretion.โ€

Becky Thwaites of pet care charity Blue Cross, said a โ€œcentrally managed animal offenders register would be a vital tool to help enforcement agencies and animal welfare organisations identify offenders and better protect animals from harmโ€.

A spokesperson for the charity Cats Protection also backed the principle of a register, โ€œas part of a broader effort to prevent individuals with a history of cruelty from accessing and harming animals againโ€.

David Bowles of the RSPCA said the โ€œhuge number of signaturesโ€ demonstrates โ€œhow passionate people feel about justice for animalsโ€.

He said that at present details of convictions and disqualification orders are stored on the Police National Computer but โ€œthis is not open to non-police personnelโ€.

โ€œThe current framework poses a significant challenge,โ€ he said. โ€œEven though courts can disqualify individuals from animal ownership, there is currently no central system for animal rescue centres, charities or private individuals, including animal breeders, pet shops, or animal care companies, to check whether someone is banned from keeping animals before selling or rehoming an animal, or employing someone to care for animals.โ€

He added: โ€œWe must find a system that helps everyone ensure that disqualified abusers cannot bypass the law and own, get access to or work with animals โ€“ whilst respecting that information is only provided appropriately to selected enforcers, to prevent vigilante and other anti-social actions.โ€

An Animal Aid spokesperson backed the register but warned of suffering caused through experiments and farming, saying: โ€œEvery animal deserves protection from unnecessary suffering โ€“ without exception.โ€

The Labour Government is not considering a separate national register of animal abusers.

A spokesperson said: โ€œAny form of animal abuse is completely unacceptable and is an offence until the Animal Welfare Act. We have a strong track record of delivering for animal welfare, we’ve already acted to improve zoo standards, end puppy smuggling and protect livestock from dog attacks.”

Leave comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *.